When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Obstacles are those frightful things you see when you take your eyes
off your goal.
Henry Ford
It's been said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over
while expecting different results. I assume you're reading this because
you want different results. Perhaps you make decisions based on the
same types of information, the same types of discussion and the
same types of analysis. Perhaps you're wondering when you'll see the
different results you want.
What follows may be quite different from what you're used to. Set
aside your expectations, take your time, and enjoy the ride.
Can you think of a time when someone made inaccurate claims, perhaps
out of ignorance, to shift blame, or to win an argument?
Can you think of a time when someone didn't seem to care about your
concerns before making a decision you didn't like? Perhaps this person
listened briefly before interrupting to lecture you, or tell you that
you're wrong, or how you should or shouldn't feel. Perhaps this person
misunderstood your concerns or didn't want to understand. Perhaps your
concerns were dismissed as not important enough to change the decision.
Were you expected to just accept that it's over and there's nothing you
can do?
If the above situations seem familiar, is there anything you'd like
to change?
I've worked with groups of 15-20 maximum-security prisoners
consisting of different races, cultures, education levels and economic
backgrounds. After learning some fundamental communication,
problem-solving and conflict-resolution skills, the groups have
respectful, constructive discussions and make unanimous decisions.
People learned to be careful about what they put in their
stomachs by considering nutritional value as well as taste. They can
learn to be at least as careful about what they put in their minds by
considering facts and reason as well as emotional satisfaction or fear.
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.
Confucius
In keeping with the spirit of Confucius' adage, I encourage you to
"do" this website. When you come to a question or incomplete statement,
think about it. Whether you share your answer with anyone is up to you.
If no answer comes to mind, share your goals and concerns rather than
giving up or asking
someone for an answer. Exploring possibilities with others may help
you clarify your thoughts, ask different questions, and discover your own
answers.
If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there.
If you do what you've always done, you'll get what you always got.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Any road also works if your destination is "not here". How will I
know I'm there if I don't know where "there" is? Before I jump on a
bandwagon, I like to know where it's going, who's driving, and how
bumpy the ride could be. Before considering potential solutions, I like
to have a clear understanding of what I hope to accomplish. This helps
me choose an appropriate solution and also helps me check for possible
unintended consequences.
Think about the questions in the section above and imagine what might
change if you get everything you asked for.
If you responded to anything in the negative, such as listing things
you don't want, think of everything in the world that isn't that. If
you tell a 2-year-old not to hit, does that mean biting or kicking is
OK?
If you're not sure how to express what you want but think you'll
know it if you see it:
-
What if you don't see anything you like?
-
What if something done your way doesn't turn out the way you
expect?
-
What if something done a different way does meet your goals?
-
How many successful outcomes would you need to see to be
confident that the next outcome will also meet your goals?
Feel free to make any needed adjustments. If you're satisfied with what you're doing,
thanks for stopping by. If not, please keep
reading.
Let it begin with me.
Think back to the opening
questions about your own past experiences and what you want to be
different next time.
I can offer anyone options such as considering the needs of others
before acting on beliefs or emotions, or exploring and re-considering
beliefs that lead to harmful actions, but the person I can influence
the most is myself. I have a few guidelines that I adjust for each
situation.
Each was partly in the right, and all were in the wrong. How can we
be certain that we know enough?
Image courtesy of Professor Tangent
I will assume that those who disagree know something I don't
I believe that we know more than me. I will ask questions and be
willing to shift my position as my understanding deepens. I will focus
on the other person as they express their own motivations, goals,
thoughts or emotions. If I notice myself looking for an opportunity to
jump in and respond, correct, or criticize, I will recognize that my
attention is drifting from the other person to myself.
I believe that assigning fault or blame to others doesn't
automatically make me right. I will offer to explore alternate
solutions together in the hope that we can both be right.
I will distinguish between observations and interpretations
If I see someone waving her arms near a toad, before jumping to the
conclusion that she's a witch who just turned someone into a toad, I
will remember I only observed that she's waving her arms and there's a
toad nearby. Perhaps she's conducting a symphony she composed for the
toad. I won't know for sure until I ask. While pursuing a specific
goal, people sometimes make decisions that harm others. I could assume
the intention was to harm others, or that this person doesn't care
about others. I could also ask about the problem and offer to help
explore ways to achieve the goal without harming others.
I will distinguish between goals and game-plans
People share goals or needs such as food, air, water, life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness. In order to meet their goals, people
might explore various game-plans, or solutions, such as buying food or
meditating. Spending money is a common game-plan. Before discussing
game-plans such as how much money to spend, I like to consider the
actual goals and other possible game-plans to meet those goals.
I will look at short-term needs and long-term needs and recognize
that different game-plans might apply to each. Long-term goals of a
starving village might be met with seeds to grow food. Villagers also
need to stay alive long enough to harvest the first crop, which
requires a short-term game-plan other than eating the seeds. Will the
short-term game-plan lead naturally to the long-term game-plan or make
the long-term game-plan more difficult? How does each possible
game-plan bring me closer to my goal?
I will speak for myself
Sometimes I have an internal response such as "that's stupid".
Before blurting out something I might later regret, I try to slow down
and think about what I hope to accomplish. If others do something that
I interpret as stupid, will calling them stupid make them smarter? Are
the others likely to thoughtfully consider my insult, decide I'm right,
and instantly change? Will finding fault with someone else make me
right, or is it possible we're both wrong? If limited options lead to
slow progress and feelings of frustration, I could say that I'm
experiencing frustration over the limited options and invite the other
person to join me in exploring new options.
Observations, interpretations, goals, and game-plans may all be
jumbled together in someone's mind. What I consider a factual
evaluation of an observation or game-plan could be heard as an attack on a
cherished goal, leading to a defensive response and a higher wall
between us. Until I understand and acknowledge the goals of others,
observations about game-plans may just bounce off, increasing the
frustration level in both of us. Recognizing and understanding these
concepts in myself makes it easier to recognize and deal with them in
others.
Easier Said than Done
We all know how others ought to behave and how others need to change. Taking our own advice
is a process and a journey. We won't always get it right the first time. It's important
to be careful how we point out lapses by others, and hope they do the same for us.
To thine own self be true.
O would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others
see us.
Robert Burns
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an
understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung
It's harder to hate up close.
unknown
Inspired by Let It Begin with Me
at Professor Tangent
It's about admitting to ourselves that we have much more in common
with others than we'd like to admit. For many people, this is the most
difficult part of the process. There's a game where people pass a
message around a circle by whispering in the ear of the next person. By
the time the message gets around the circle, it's often changed. As a
message travels from our ears to our conscious mind, it may be changed
by past experiences, preconceptions, emotions, or associations with
other concepts. We can explore these inner pathways by observing and
understanding our own thoughts, and then ask questions that help us
understand others.
Think back to the opening
questions about your own past experiences and what you want to be
different next time.
-
When I meet someone new, I think about ...
-
As I get to know someone, some changes in me are ...
-
Some ways I respond differently to different people are ...
-
Dissenting opinions are/are not helpful because ...
-
I respect the opinions of others when ...
-
I trust people who ...
-
When I hear a rumor about someone I don't like, I ...
-
I accept something as true when ...
-
I know I'm getting good advice when ...
-
I'm confident I found the root of a problem when ...
-
I accept the needs of others as equal to my own needs when ...
-
When I'm "invested" in a particular game-plan, I ...
-
If I notice a flaw in someone else's goal
or game-plan
, I ...
-
If someone points out a flaw in my goal
or game-plan
, I ...
-
When I want someone to change, I ...
-
When someone expects me to change, I ...
-
I'm ready to make a decision when ...
-
I consider a situation "good enough" when ...
-
I reconsider past decisions when ...
-
I consider a dispute resolved when ...
-
Something I would like others to know about me is ...
-
Something surprising I learned about someone else is ...
Many people find it easier to relate to others who are similar in
some way. How do you know what you might have in common with someone
you just met? If there are obvious
differences , could there also be something positive you both
share? If you both like music but listen to different kinds of music,
you might look deeper and consider:
-
When do we listen to music?
-
Do we share a reason we like our favorite music?
-
How did we first learn about the music we like now?
-
How could we help someone else understand why we like this music?
-
When we first heard this music, did we like it as much as we like
it now?
-
What kind of music did we like before and what changed?
-
Do we expect to listen only to this kind of music for the rest of
our lives?
-
Was there an especially meaningful moment in our lives associated
with our favorite music?
Unless I'm certain that the other person enjoys answering personal
questions, I might begin by briefly sharing my own thoughts as an
example of the type of response I'm inviting. I try to assure others by
my example that I won't ask something I'm not willing to discuss about
myself. If the other person accepts my invitation to speak, I let them
know I'm listening by my body language, eye contact, and giving them
time to fully express their thoughts. When they finish, I might repeat
something I found interesting or meaningful. If I'm tempted to
interrupt and respond, correct or criticize, I consider that a warning
that I'm thinking about myself when I should be learning about someone
else. As my understanding deepens, my options increase and I may shift
my own position in some way.
We know more than me.
What about voting?
-
Will a vote end the controversy?
-
What if someone doesn't like any of the choices offered?
-
If there are more than two choices, each individual choice may
get less than half the total vote. How much support should the
winning option have?
-
Should math students vote for their favorite solution to an
equation?
-
Should 2 wolves and a lamb choose lunch by voting?
What about negotiating?
-
Will trading concessions make everyone more satisfied?
-
Will splitting the difference get people what they need?
-
If we agree to disagree, is the controversy over?
-
If everyone is equally unsatisfied, have we succeeded?
What about lectures or speeches?
-
Will manipulating opinion solve the problem once and for all?
-
How do you know if the information is correct?
-
How many different perspectives are needed for a complete understanding?
-
How do you know when you've heard enough to make an informed
decision?
Groups can find solutions acceptable to everyone in the group. When
I'm satisfied with a group decision, I'm more likely to help make it
work and more likely to consider the problem solved. If I'm on the
losing side of a vote, or I'm limited to choosing between unpleasant
options, I may look for ways to keep the controversy alive after the
vote is over. Making decisions as a group may take longer than voting
but could solve the problem sooner. As with voting, negotiating or debating , some
people may choose not to participate in the process, perhaps because
they don't have a strong preference, or they're confident that another
participant adequately represents their position.
Think back to the opening
questions about your own past experiences and what you want to be
different next time.
1: Explore the Problem
Listen to everyone's goals or needs and try to see the problem from
each individual's perspective. If I notice myself wanting to jump in
and respond, correct or criticize, I consider that a warning that I'm
focusing on myself when this first step is about understanding the
needs of others. We could mention short-term
needs and long-term
needs if they are different. Focus on goals .
We look at game-plans
in steps 4 and 5. We could also consider the qualities or
characteristics of each person's ideal solution.
Are some qualities or characteristics more important than others?
2: Look for Common Goals
Think about which goals or needs everyone
shares . This is our chance to release our inner 3-year-old and
relentlessly ask "why?" Why do I need ___? So I can do ___. Why do I
want to do ___? What will happen if I don't do ___? If I do ___ then I
___. You may end up with a basic concept such as survival, safety,
shelter, liberty, happiness, inner peace, or social interaction.
3: Identify Resources
List potential resources such as money, time, materials, paid staff and
volunteers.
4: Create a Solution Smorgasbord
List potential game-plans. This is an opportunity to expand our options
before making a commitment to any particular game-plan. Look for
opportunities to split proposals into smaller pieces and combine the
split pieces in various ways.
5: Evaluate Each Potential Game-plan
Allow each person a chance to comment on the possible game-plans. This
should be the first time you consider the merits and potential problems
of any particular game-plan. How well does each game-plan meet the
goals stated in step 2? Look for ways to shorten the list by
combining game-plans that have much in common. If people seem committed to contradictory game-plans,
take a step back, review the goals, and work backwards from the goal to a suitable game-plan.
Keep evaluating until everyone is satisfied.
6: Decide How to Make It Work
Who, what, when, where, how? If everyone is convinced there's no way to
make the chosen solution work, review the previous steps.
Review
Do an occasional check-in to see how the agreement is working and look
for unintended consequences. Repeat previous steps as needed to make
changes or corrections.
It Still Doesn't Work! What Now?
Sometimes, despite patient persistence, agreement eludes the participants.
Perhaps someone is blocking a solution just because they can. Perhaps people
just don't want the system to work, or don't want to go along with the process. Perhaps
some like the status quo and don't care that others are left out. Perhaps some hate
each other more than they want a solution.
First, remember this is a journey, not a destination. In many cases, you don't just flip a switch and then
everyone lives happily ever after. It's an ongoing process. Do you have enough to get started?
Is it possible to split the group in a way that each smaller group can create their own solution?
What aspects of a solution can you control now? Is that enough to get started? We may have limited control
of a situation but we can always control our own response.
If some participants are completely left out, is there a way they can get by while continuing to work on a more inclusive solution?
|